This article was posted on Monday, Feb 01, 2021

While seasoned landlords are no strangers to handling tenant disputes, one particular situation – tenant-on-tenant discrimination – requires additional discussion and immediate action. Buried within the Oregon Administrative Rules is OAR 839-005-0206 which details specific theories of discrimination involving housing in Oregon.  

One particular section involves landlords: (5) Tenant-on-tenant harassment: A housing provider is liable for a resident’s harassment of another resident when the housing provider knew or should have known of the conduct, unless the housing provider took immediate and appropriate corrective action.

This administrative rule reads as a theory of liability for tenants against their landlord if they are harassed by other tenants, based on a protected status if the landlord did not take “immediate and appropriate corrective action.”  Such exposure may seem strange, but some courts have already previously determined that the Fair Housing Act contains the same protections for tenants.  If the landlord knew, or should have known, of tenant-on-tenant discrimination and failed to take action, the victim tenant may sue the landlord based on this discrimination.

What Does This Mean for Landlords?

First, a landlord should do as he or she always does with tenant disputes.  If complaints or disputes between tenants arise, take proper investigative measures to determine what actually happened.  This would involve interviewing the parties and witnesses and reviewing any other written statements or documents provided.

- Advertisers -

Second, creating a log book and/or incident report can assist down the road in recreating what, if anything, happened.  Landlords should utilize/create such items anyway as a best practice as they are infinitely helpful in the event of litigation.

What to Do

If it appears or is discovered that discriminatory language and/or conduct occurred, a landlord should take immediate action.  In the event of a he-said/she-said situation, it may behoove the landlord to defer on the side of aggressive action, as opposed to inaction.

Fair Housing lawsuits are no laughing matter; often involving substantial attorney fees, costs and stressful discovery processes, all of which could potentially be avoided through affirmative action.

As a landlord’s attorney, I have learned that not all tenant disputes are created equal.  Some are petty and/or involve people who cannot be placated or made happy unless they live entirely away from each other.  Some involve racism, discrimination and/or bigotry which should have no place in our world.  

While these are two extremes that do not encompass the entirety of tenant-on-tenant disputes, if a landlord finds himself/herself facing the latter of these two scenarios, working with your attorney on an aggressive response can be the difference between resolution and litigation.

Bradley S. Kraus is an attorney at Warren Allen, LLP.  His primary practice area is landlord/tenant law, but he also assists clients with various litigation matters, probate matters, real estate disputes and family law matters in Oregon and Washington.  You can reach him via email at [email protected] or by phone at 503-255-8795.