This article was posted on Wednesday, Jan 01, 2014

The below article was written by Jon Coupal, President of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association.

This is a tale of coattails – the coattails of an

800 pound gorilla known as Proposition 13.

In 1978, support for Proposition 13 swept 17 new legislators – nicknamed “Prop 13 Babies” – into office. It was clear, at the time, that Proposition 13 had very long coattails.
Over the years, the professional political class has tried to downplay the influence of Proposition 13 on electoral politics, even though polls show that it would pass by the same two-thirds margin as it did in 1978. Political consultants have advised candidates, in all but the most left leaning districts, to pay lip service to Proposition 13 but then to move on to other issues. Few candidates have been willing to make the defense of Proposition 13 the centerpiece of their campaigns.

The thinking that Proposition 13 really doesn’t matter to today’s voters has been turned on its head by the recent results from the Special Election in the 45th Assembly district, located in the Los Angeles suburbs in the southwest San Fernando Valley.

When Representative Bob Blumenfield resigned in the middle of his term to take a seat on the Los Angeles City Council, voters chose as the top two candidates for a November 19th runoff a self-described pro-business Democrat and a Republican who pledged to defend Proposition 13 against efforts by majority Democrats in the Legislature to destroy its taxpayer protections.

- Advertisers -

Virtually, no one gave Susan Shelley, a socially moderate, fiscally responsible Republican, a chance. (In the interest in full disclosure, she was supported by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association PAC.) The 45th Assembly District voter registration shows 49% Democrats and 25% Republicans. Last year, the district gave President Obama 63% of its votes and Senator Feinstein 67%. The California Target Book, which applies professional analysis to each contested legislative district, called it a “safe Democratic district,” and the big money flowed to the Democrat.

Shelley, an articulate, informed and energetic candidate, was not deterred. She understood and shared the concerns of her community, where homeowners feel threatened by efforts in the Legislature to make it much easier to increase property taxes and other charges and levies on taxpayers.

She adopted the slogan “Protect Proposition 13” and pushed that message – almost to the exclusion of other positions – in every speech and political advertisement. She alerted voters to the fact that the Democrats, who now have an overwhelming majority in the Legislature, are pushing bills that would severely undercut Proposition 13’s protections for taxpayers.

On Election Day, the political establishment was rocked by the result. Shelley trailed Democrat Matt Dababneh by less than 200 votes with nearly 3000 late arriving ballot still to be counted.
When asked by the Associated Press to comment on election results and voter concerns about Proposition 13, several spokesmen for legislative Democrats scoffed at the idea that Prop 13 is at risk because of their efforts. But this simply isn’t true. Seven bills backed by Democrats are designed to do one thing, and one thing only; to circumvent the protections contained in Proposition 13 so they can vacuum out the contents of taxpayers’ wallets. If they don’t intend to increase the burden on taxpayers, why would they introduce and support this legislation in the first place?

The latest ballot count shows that the Democrat pulled out a very narrow victory. Some will say that the close result of this David and Goliath contest has little meaning for other elections. After all, they will rationalize, it is typical in Special Elections for turnout to be low, and anything can happen. This overlooks the fact that Dababneh is an attractive candidate himself, he outraised Shelley by 10 to one, and was running in an overwhelmingly Democratic district. That he was barely able to squeak by in spite of having every advantage – the victory is so narrow, he may have earned the ironic nickname “Landside” – is the direct result of a high quality, courageous candidate harnessing the power of Proposition 13.

In the next regularly scheduled elections, candidates who refuse to fully and enthusiastically commit to preserving Proposition 13 better be looking over their shoulders.

[Dan’s Note: Pass The Word! AOA does not usually get involved in politicians running against each other BUT you and AOA must inform all property owners and politicians of the above information.  The numbers on this election alone should help scare the big spenders into protecting our property against more and more taxation.  Prop. 13 is saving you a bundle of money now…..until our politicians think they can get away with another huge plan to get themselves more spending money from you.  Please let them know that they will not get away with it this time!  Send a copy of this article to any politician you know and ask them what they think about Prop. 13 so that you will know how to vote the next time they run for office!  Also, send a copy to all property owners you know – especially apartment owners.]

To share this article with others, go to,  scroll down to the featured article and click on one or more of the icons at the top or bottom of this article in order to use it for email, or on Facebook or Twitter.  Snail mail works great too.  Thank you!

Jon Coupal is president of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association — California’s largest grass-roots taxpayer organization dedicated to the protection of Proposition 13 and the advancement of taxpayers’ rights.


Leave a Reply