Following in the footsteps of tenant groups in Glendale and Long Beach, a Pasadena group has also filed preliminary paperwork to place a rent control initiative on an upcoming ballot.
The Pasadena ballot measure would:
- establish a city-run rental housing board
- limit rent increases, and
- force the city to adopt “just-cause” eviction policies — which would limit the number of reasons a landlord could evict a tenant
Glendale and Long Beach
Ballot initiative for rent control in Glendale and Long Beach were rejected in November of last year. The petitions were deemed “deficient and invalid” for several reasons. Submitted petitions did not include the text of the measure, several sections had pages glued and pasted on top of each other, whited out and/or violated the California Election Code. Rent control advocates in both places say they plan on refilling the paper work.
The Southern California cities that have adopted rent control ordinances are Santa Monica, West Hollywood, Los Angeles and Beverly Hills. Over the last two years, Pasadena, Glendale, Inglewood and Long Beach have begun fighting to add their cities to that list.
AB 1506 – Costa Hawkins Repeal
The Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act (“Costa-Hawkins”) is a California state law, enacted in 1995, which places limits on municipal rent control ordinances. Costa-Hawkins preempts the field in two major ways:
- First, it prohibits cities from establishing rent control over certain kinds of residential units (e.g., single family dwellings, and newly constructed units, which are both deemed exempt).
- Second, it prohibits municipal “vacancy control”, also called “strict” rent control. In the vacancy control of an apartment, a city’s ordinance works to deny or limit an owner’s ability to increase the rental amount to new tenant(s), even in cases where the prior tenant(s) voluntarily vacated the apartment or were evicted for cause (such as failing to pay rent). In other words Costa-Hawkins, by now prohibiting vacancy control in the above circumstances, mandates that cities allow an apartment owner the right to rent it when vacant at any price (i.e., market price).
AB 156 was the biggest threat to property owners since rent control itself. It was a proposed measure to repeal a state law that bars rent caps on units built after 1995. If it had passed, it would make it easier for these other cities to enact rent control laws.
Hopefully, they won’t continue to try and get more legal signatures. In the meantime, tell all of your friends not to sign any of this tenant welfare nonsense when they are approached at the grocery store and other places!
Patricia Harris is Senior Editor of the Apartment Owners Association News and Buyers Guide.